<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>polyscience.org &#187; polyscience.org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://polyscience.org/category/polyscienceorg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://polyscience.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 02:19:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Moving on</title>
		<link>http://polyscience.org/2006/05/moving-on-onthepharm/</link>
		<comments>http://polyscience.org/2006/05/moving-on-onthepharm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 02:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polyscience.org]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polyscience.org/2006/05/moving-on-onthepharm/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here I was, re-opening shop, only to disappear after a week or so. Now I&#8217;m moving on, permanently. As in, leaving the business of science writing. Over the last six months or so, my interests have been slowly shifting, and I find myself interested in &#8220;science&#8221; as a general concept less and less. I&#8217;m more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here I was, re-opening shop, only to disappear after a week or so. Now I&#8217;m moving on, permanently. As in, leaving the business of science writing. Over the last six months or so, my interests have been slowly shifting, and I find myself interested in &#8220;science&#8221; as a general concept less and less. I&#8217;m more focused on business, medicine, and the business of medicine.</p>
<p>I never thought I was particularly good at writing about science and science-related things. I always felt as though there was someone who knew more, someone who could convey my ideas better than I could. I also felt as though it was a relatively new niche. I discovered quickly that I had been mistaken. It is for these reasons that I am no longer going to be writing about science and related interests.</p>
<p>While writing for polyscience.org, I always got the most enjoyment from writing about medicine. Specifically adding commentary to news articles written by journalists whose first area of study was certainly not medicine. In the meantime, I&#8217;ve also picked up quite an interest in business, and so it only seemed natural to marry the two ideas.</p>
<p>Thus, <a href="http://onthepharm.net"><strong>On The Pharm</strong></a> was born. I&#8217;ve been writing there for a few days, I can honestly say that writing for it does not feel like work. Indeed, it&#8217;s more fun than anything else, probably because 1) it&#8217;s easier and 2) I don&#8217;t have to learn so many ideas from scratch like I did when writing about science as a whole. I can focus on my niche, and that&#8217;s what I want to do. I also like the look of the site much better. So without further ado, here is my latest work-in-progress:</p>
<p>URL: <a href="http://onthepharm.net"><strong>http://onthepharm.net</strong></a><br />
Feed: <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/OnThePharm"><strong>http://feeds.feedburner.com/OnThePharm</strong></a></p>
<p>Some stuff will be technical, some will be fluffy, some will be business-oriented, and some of it will be tongue-in-cheek. And all of it will likely be informal. I prefer to talk in my posts as though I&#8217;m talking to a person, and I hope that comes across, unlike here where I pretended to be an omniscient narrator. I&#8217;m writing for it every day (so far), and I have a small backlog of material from the last two weeks, but I&#8217;m slowly clearing it out.</p>
<p>I can only hope that it&#8217;ll find a niche of readers so I&#8217;m not listening to myself echo in cyberspace, because isn&#8217;t that what every writer wants? Readers?</p>
<p>[tags]writing, On The Pharm, Pharmacy, medicine[/tags]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://polyscience.org/2006/05/moving-on-onthepharm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New opening, new theme</title>
		<link>http://polyscience.org/2006/01/new-opening-new-theme/</link>
		<comments>http://polyscience.org/2006/01/new-opening-new-theme/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 05:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[polyscience.org]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polyscience.org/2006/01/new-opening-new-theme/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s pretty brain-dead obvious that I&#8217;ve got a new theme now. I&#8217;ve been wanting a nice 3 column theme ever since I began, but there weren&#8217;t any worth using until just recently. As you can see, the one I&#8217;m using now is not fixed width &#8212; which is something I&#8217;ve been wanting for a long [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s pretty brain-dead obvious that I&#8217;ve got a new theme now. I&#8217;ve been wanting a nice 3 column theme ever since I began, but there weren&#8217;t any worth using until just recently. As you can see, the one I&#8217;m using now is not fixed width &#8212; which is something I&#8217;ve been wanting for a long while. I hacked up the CSS a bit to get it looking the way I want it to, and it&#8217;s now on its way to where I want it to be. I can&#8217;t decide how to use the right-hand side. I think I&#8217;m going to poke around at some websites that I like and see how they use their three columns. I&#8217;m thinking that it&#8217;ll be used for articles and such. Not sure yet.</p>
<p>There will be more tweaks in the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://polyscience.org/2006/01/new-opening-new-theme/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grand re-opening&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://polyscience.org/2006/01/grand-reopening/</link>
		<comments>http://polyscience.org/2006/01/grand-reopening/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 15:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[polyscience.org]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polyscience.org/2006/01/grand-reopening/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a lot of thought and consideration, I have decided to start writing here again. Previously, as I mentioned in my last &#8212; and what I thought would be my final post back in October &#8212; I&#8217;ve been writing for Ars Technica&#8217;s Nobel Intent science journal. I have decided that I want to write for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a lot of thought and consideration, I have decided to start writing here again. Previously, as I mentioned in my <a href="http://polyscience.org/2005/10/closing-up-shop/">last</a> &#8212; and what I thought would be my final post back in October &#8212; I&#8217;ve been writing for <a href="http://arstechnica.com/index.ars">Ars Technica&#8217;s</a> <a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/science.ars">Nobel Intent</a> science journal.</p>
<p>I have decided that I want to write for myself again. Not because Ars is a bad place to write and hang out &#8212; it&#8217;s not, by any means &#8212; but because I miss creating something that&#8217;s truly <em>mine</em>. As you probably know, I use <a href="http://wordpress.org/">WordPress</a> to do my publishing here and on my personal blog, and one of the plugins I use is wp-cron in conjunction with another plugin to send me a backup of my database every night. I&#8217;ve missed seeing it grow little-by-little. I mentioned on my personal blog back in September that I was <a href="http://rianjs.net/2005/09/wordpress-rules/">reluctant to give up writing for myself</a>. Well, the pull back towards doing my own thing has proved stronger than my desire to be paid for my writing and have a huge number of readers. That&#8217;s the entrepreneur coming out in me, I guess.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t regret my time writing for Ars at all. I learned a lot while I was there about doing a thorough job writing and researching. Having a much larger readership forces you to alter the way you write and think about things. Jonathan and Jay are great guys &#8212; I don&#8217;t regret sharing space with them at all. Truthfully, I wish I had a partner here at polyscience to write alongside me regularly as an equal &#8220;owner&#8221; if you will.</p>
<p>Anyway, starting today I&#8217;ll be back writing for myself, here on polyscience.org. Which I&#8217;m very excited about. I don&#8217;t intend to give it up again anytime soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://polyscience.org/2006/01/grand-reopening/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Closing up shop</title>
		<link>http://polyscience.org/2005/10/closing-up-shop/</link>
		<comments>http://polyscience.org/2005/10/closing-up-shop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 15:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[polyscience.org]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polyscience.org/?p=152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After approximately 90 days and over 150 posts, and several full-length articles, reviews, and interviews, polyscience is closing up shop. I&#8217;m not going to stop writing, though. You might say I&#8217;ve been &#8220;acquired&#8221; &#8212; Ars Technica is launching a new science journal to go with their other technology journals. It will most likely be going [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After approximately 90 days and over 150 posts, and several full-length <a href="http://polyscience.org/articles/">articles</a>, <a href="http://polyscience.org/reviews/">reviews</a>, and <a href="http://polyscience.org/interviews/">interviews</a>, polyscience is closing up shop. I&#8217;m not going to stop writing, though. You might say I&#8217;ve been &#8220;acquired&#8221; &#8212; Ars Technica is launching a new <a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/science.ars">science journal</a> to go with their other technology <a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals.ars">journals</a>. It will most likely be going live tomorrow.</p>
<p>It is with a small amount of sadness that I&#8217;m saying goodbye to polyscience.org. I will leave the site here as it stands now, with comments still open. (I get email notifications of new comments so I&#8217;ll still reply.) I accomplished more here than I ever really thought I would. I learned quite a lot about a great many things, and I&#8217;ll be referencing some of the posts that I wrote here in my journal entries for Ars. When I say I accomplished more than I thought I would, you have to understand that most of the projects I start start well, and then fizzle out in about a month. You see, I&#8217;ve got a fantastic first gear, but when it comes to doing things for the long-haul, well&#8230; I&#8217;m not the greatest at consistency. I am surprised and pleased that I ended up having several full-length features. I didn&#8217;t think I&#8217;d ever see the day that that happened without someone holding a gun to my head.</p>
<p>It was nice to have my own sandbox to play in. I&#8217;m a little depressed because I won&#8217;t be able to write longer features like I used to here. I am pleased, though, to be writing under Ars&#8217;s &#8220;pirate&#8221; flag for lack of a better term. I will be free to speak my mind to a much larger audience. I will have to elevate my game, though, and I know that. More background research, more review time before I click the publish button, as <a href="http://polyscience.org/2005/09/the-human-brain-is-still-evolving/#comments">recent comments</a> by Hat Monster have shown. And this is fine; I look forward to the new challenge. I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ll get flamed plenty often by people who know more than I do about a given subject &#8212; that is simply the nature of the game when you write about such a broad field like &#8220;science.&#8221; As I said in my <a href="http://polyscience.org/2005/07/in-the-beginning/">very first post</a>, I am a science enthusiast, not a scientist.</p>
<p>Some closing stats for you all. All of these are figures from July 3 up until now.</p>
<ul>
<li>17,638 page impressions</li>
<li>156 comments and pingbacks (more comments than PBs, though)</li>
<li>152 posts (including this one)</li>
</ul>
<p>And an immeasurable amount of pride. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://polyscience.org/2005/10/closing-up-shop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In the beginning&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://polyscience.org/2005/07/in-the-beginning/</link>
		<comments>http://polyscience.org/2005/07/in-the-beginning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2005 00:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[polyscience.org]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I should probably come up with something exciting for the inaugural post of polyscience.org. Unfortunately after a long day at work, my brain is not cooperating. I hope to have a post or two up tomorrow on the subject matter that this site is to be about. What is this site about? Well I love [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should probably come up with something exciting for the inaugural post of polyscience.org. Unfortunately after a long day at work, my brain is not cooperating. I hope to have a post or two up tomorrow on the subject matter that this site is to be about.</p>
<p><strong>What is this site about?</strong></p>
<p>Well I love science. I&#8217;m what you might call a science enthusiast, and I&#8217;d like to share my love of science with the world. I&#8217;m not an expert, nor am I an amateur. To call myself one or the other would be a discredit to the <a href="http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Mathematicians/Fermat.html">amateurs of old</a> and the <a href="http://www.mkaku.org/">experts of today</a>. Nonetheless, I like to think I know a little bit more about science than most. That could be my ego talking, but I think you have to have something of an ego to write something that anyone can read and criticize.</p>
<p><strong>What can be found here?</strong></p>
<p>What you will find here is anything science-related, ranging from pure science to the impact of science on society. Mostly the former, but some of the latter. Some posts will be more in-depth, and some will be more blog-ish where I quote something and post a link to something that I thought was cool. Some philosophy as it relates to science will also be covered.</p>
<p>The subject matter will likely be diverse. I&#8217;m interested in almost everything: physics, medicine, computer science, and it&#8217;s likely that I&#8217;ll even post something chemistry-related at some point as well. (The horror!)</p>
<p><strong>What is my background?</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;m currently working on my Doctor of Pharmacy degree (PharmD). You might think this isn&#8217;t very conducive to knowing much about the more traditional sciences like physics &#8212; and you would be right. Nonetheless, I spend a lot of my free time (of which there seems to be very little) reading books on cosmology and other subjects. I am weak in math: you won&#8217;t see my pontificating on anything other than cutesy little basic math things, because I do not enjoy mathematics, nor am I especially good at it. (But I&#8217;m not bad at it either.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://polyscience.org/2005/07/in-the-beginning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
