<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hurricane Katrina and price gouging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://polyscience.org/2005/09/hurricane-katrina-and-price-gouging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://polyscience.org/2005/09/hurricane-katrina-and-price-gouging/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 19:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rian</title>
		<link>http://polyscience.org/2005/09/hurricane-katrina-and-price-gouging/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Rian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2005 02:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polyscience.org/?p=87#comment-141</guid>
		<description>I don't believe that this is good enough, simply because the "bare minimum" varies from person to person depending on the material being rationed. Allowing a black market to blossom is an intriguing idea, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t believe that this is good enough, simply because the &#8220;bare minimum&#8221; varies from person to person depending on the material being rationed. Allowing a black market to blossom is an intriguing idea, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Happysin</title>
		<link>http://polyscience.org/2005/09/hurricane-katrina-and-price-gouging/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Happysin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 23:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polyscience.org/?p=87#comment-140</guid>
		<description>Let me offer a suitable alternative.  Official rationing and a black market.  

Everyone gets the bare minimum needed (provided those who set up rationing can do it effectively), and then those that need/want more, and are willing to pay a premium for it, can.

It isn't legal in the strictest sense, but it allows for flexibility a full rationing system can't have, and it helps the worst off in a way pure market economics can't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me offer a suitable alternative.  Official rationing and a black market.  </p>
<p>Everyone gets the bare minimum needed (provided those who set up rationing can do it effectively), and then those that need/want more, and are willing to pay a premium for it, can.</p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t legal in the strictest sense, but it allows for flexibility a full rationing system can&#8217;t have, and it helps the worst off in a way pure market economics can&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
