<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The battle for Evolution begins (again)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://polyscience.org/2005/09/battle-for-evolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://polyscience.org/2005/09/battle-for-evolution/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: polyscience.org &#187; Of Pandas and creationism</title>
		<link>http://polyscience.org/2005/09/battle-for-evolution/#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>polyscience.org &#187; Of Pandas and creationism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2005 15:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polyscience.org/?p=138#comment-246</guid>
		<description>[...] A few days ago, I wrote about the trial going on in Dover, PA wherein the school board is trying to shoehorn intelligent design into the science curriculum. The textbook they are using, Of Pandas and People, espouses the theory of intelligent design. But intelligent design is simply a rewording of the term &#8220;creationism&#8221; for political reasons. Literally. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A few days ago, I wrote about the trial going on in Dover, PA wherein the school board is trying to shoehorn intelligent design into the science curriculum. The textbook they are using, Of Pandas and People, espouses the theory of intelligent design. But intelligent design is simply a rewording of the term &#8220;creationism&#8221; for political reasons. Literally. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
